Why Did Bradbury Use the Title ‘There Will Come Soft Rains’

The book ‘There Will Come Soft Rains’ is a Dystopia about how humans will all die out leaving no trace and effect on nature and the world around us. There Will Come Soft Rains† concerns the technological revolution, as well as the atomic warfare, and its effect on our society, how it isolates us from one another. It is about the last day in the life of a wonderful electronic home - after an atomic war. It is the only house left standing on its desolate, ruined street and is still running to capacity even though its inhabitants remain only as shadows embedded on its walls. The title is the same as of a poem written previous to the story being published. The title is not only interlinked to the story and the message in it but also to the†¦show more content†¦The death of the dog also resembles the way that humans died. The dog entered the house with technology cleaning up behind it. However, when the dog dies, the mice take it away and suddenly ‘the d og was gone’. This is like how humans died out without there being any remembrance for them or any trace of their living. Bradbury also makes oblique references to the family that once lived there. On the wall there was a black ‘silhouette in paint of a man mowing a lawn’. This silhouette stands as a remembrance to the people who used to live here but that is the only trace of them and there are no traces of them anywhere else. The fact that the family is just a memory on a wall reveals how humans would be another picture on a history line, with the wall resembling part of a long line of history to come. The city is often described as empty and dead. The city is described as ‘ruined’. The word ‘ruined’ is a strong word, which implies that the world is going to become so bad that there could be no recovering. Also, the city is described as having given off a ‘radioactive glow that could have been seen for miles’. The word ‘glow’ carries connotations with explosions and bombs. The word ‘radioactive’ is also associated with complex technology and Bradbury makes it seem that the technology will affect towns and cities very often and that atomic bombs will be very common. It is also very ironic that the poem chosen was a favourite of the lady. AsShow MoreRelatedThe World Is Too Much With Us, And Ray Bradbury s `` There Will Come Soft Rains ``2767 Words   |  12 PagesEarth offers. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s â€Å"The Birthmark†, William Wordsworth’s â€Å"The World Is Too Much with Us†, and Ray Bradbury’s â€Å"There Will Come Soft Rains† are all examples of why we should focus less on what humanity wants and more on what nature needs to thrive. Although each piece of writing presents nature in different ways, they all prove that nature needs to come before humanity, each giving a warning to what may occur if we try to put humanity’s wants first and alter, or do not respect, nature

Engaging Promoting Autism Wellness - 1746 Words

Engaging in Promoting Autism Wellness Introduction When one thinks of autism, many people do not fully understand the disorder, this is due to lack of research, media perception, and lack of involvement with these individuals. Hillman (2006) describes autism as, â€Å" a devastating developmental disorder in which children have core deficits in verbal and nonverbal communication, social interaction, and pretend or imaginative play.† These difficulties prevent the child from interacting with individuals. They often avoid eye contact and lack of facial or emotional expression. Along with this, the absence of making friends or desire to even be in company can lead to lack of social interaction. Aside from developmental delay, children with†¦show more content†¦They can provide critical information about evidence-based treatment, offer assistance in overcoming barriers to intensive treatment, including personnel selection, and provide ongoing support to family members (Goodman, Reed, Athey-Lloyd, 2015). Case examples illustrate how psychologists can help families address specific barriers to intensive treatment. Treatment description One way to benefit the behaviors of autism is by using ABA, this form of intervention has been documented to have positive improvement with individuals with autism (Hillman 2006). ABA requires a team of Psychologists, behavioral specialists, educators, social workers, medical professionals, and most importantly the unlimited cooperation of parents. A positive outcome requires thirty to forty hours a week of intensive treatment. The process of starting new routines and time modifications of the parents’ schedules can be overwhelming, the support of psychologists is crucial for the parent’s support during this process (Erba, 2000). Other team members also have crucial responsibilities, educators are responsible for producing materials to motivate the client to engage during interactions. Behavior specialists personnel (BSCs) then can target skill development through one-on-one therapy (Hillman 2006). A case study by Hillman (2006), explained how a boy with autism, Johnny, often took three hours to get to bed becauseShow MoreRelatedMusic Therapy And Its Effect On The Quality Of A Person s Life1802 Words   |  8 Pageslives in a very powerful way, and science has shown us that it can have a positive effect on the quality of a person’s life. Music therapy is a healthcare practice that utilizes clinical and evidence-based music therapy methods to address stress, wellness, pain, physical rehabilitation, and to improve a person’s quality of life. It can have a significantly positive effect on people—physically and emotionally. While the earliest known mention of music being used as a therapy appeared in 1789 in a ColumbianRead MoreArt Therapy Essay2790 Words   |  12 Pageseducation system, focusing on children who are learning disabled, mentally challenged, emotionally disturbed, socially disadvantaged. According to the AATA, art therapy is practiced in ment al health, rehabilitation, medical, educational, forensic, wellness, private practice and community settings. Within these settings, art therapy can be applied to an extremely diverse client population in individual, couples, family, and group therapy formats. Art therapy is an effective treatment for people experiencingRead MoreGoodlife Fitness Essay12449 Words   |  50 PagesLife Kids Foundation. * The Kilee Patchell-Evans Autism Research Foundation (founded in 2003). * GoodLife labeled chocolate milk as their official recovery beverage in order to support the local Dairy Farmers of Canada (DFC). Business Objectives/Mission amp; Unique Selling Proposition * To give every Canadian the opportunity to live a fit and healthy Good Life. * To help corporate Canada achieve health and wellness. * Simple Philosophy: Caring - unmatched customerRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pagesconsidered the standard for all organizational behavior textbooks, this edition continues its tradition of making current, relevant research come alive for students. While maintaining its hallmark features—clear writing style, cutting-edge content, and engaging pedagogy—the fourteenth edition has been updated to reflect the most recent research within the field of organizational behavior. This is one of the most comprehensive and thorough revisions of Organizational Behavior we’ve undertaken, and whileRead More_x000C_Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis355457 Words   |  1422 Pagesmay not be enough to determine whether a treatment really does have an effect. People sometimes respond merely to the power of suggestion! For example, suppose a study designed to determine whether a particular herbal supplement is effective in promoting weight loss uses an experimental group that takes the herbal supplement and a control group that takes nothing. It is possible that those who take the herbal supplement and believe that they are taking something that will help them to lose weight

Notes on the Economics of Game Theory Essay Example For Students

Notes on the Economics of Game Theory Essay Sam Vaknins Psychology, Philosophy, Economics and Foreign Affairs Web SitesConsider this :Could Western management techniques be successfully implemented in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) ? Granted, they have to be adapted, modified and cannot be imported in their entirety. But their crux, their inalienable nucleus can this be transported and transplanted in CEE ? Theory provides us with a positive answer. Human agents are the same everywhere and are mostly rational. Practice begs to differ. Basic concepts such as the money value of time or the moral and legal meaning of property are non existent. The legal, political and economic environments are all unpredictable. As a result, economic players will prefer to maximize their utility immediately (steal from the workplace, for instance) than to wait for longer term (potentially, larger) benefits. Warrants (stock options) convertible to the companys shares constitute a strong workplace incentive in the West (because t here is an horizon and they increase the employees welfare in the long term). Where the future is speculation speculation withers. Stock options or a small stake in his firm, will only encourage the employee to blackmail the other shareholders by paralysing the firm, to abuse his new position and will be interpreted as immunity, conferred from above, from the consequences of illegal activities. The very allocation of options or shares will be interpreted as a sign of weakness, dependence and need, to be exploited. Hierarchy is equated with slavery and employees will rather harm their long term interests than follow instructions or be subjected to criticism never mind how constructive. The employees in CEE regard the corporate environment as a conflict zone, a zero sum game (in which the gains by some equal the losses to others). In the West, the employees participate in the increase in the firms value. The difference between these attitudes is irreconcilable. Now, let us consider this :An entrepreneur is a person who is gifted at identifying the unsatisfied needs of a market, at mobilizing and organizing the resources required to satisfy those needs and at defining a long-term strategy of development and marketing. As the enterprise grows, two processes combine to denude the entrepreneur of some of his initial functions. The firm has ever growing needs for capital : financial, human, assets and so on. Additionally, the company begins (or should begin) to interface and interact with older, better established firms. Thus, the company is forced to create its first management team : a general manager with the right doses of respectability, connections and skills, a chief financial officer, a host of consultants and so on. In theory if all our properly motivated financially all these players (entrepreneurs and managers) will seek to maximize the value of the firm. What happens, in reality, is that both work to minimize it, each for its own rea sons. The managers seek to maximize their short-term utility by securing enormous pay packages and other forms of company-dilapidating compensation. The entrepreneurs feel that they are strangled, shackled, held back by bureaucracy and they rebel. They oust the management, or undermine it, turning it into an ineffective representative relic. They assume real, though informal, control of the firm. They do so by defining a new set of strategic goals for the firm, which call for the institution of an entrepreneurial rather than a bureaucratic type of management. These cycles of initiative-consolidation-new initiative-revolution-consolidation are the dynamos of company growth. Growth leads to maximization of value. However, the players dont know or do not fully believe that they are in the process of maximizing the companys worth. On the contrary, consciously, the managers say : lets maximize the benefits that we derive from this company, as long as we are still here. The entrepreneurs- owners say : we cannot tolerate this stifling bureaucracy any longer. We prefer to have a smaller company but all ours. The growth cycles forces the entrepreneurs to dilute their holdings (in order to raise the capital necessary to finance their initiatives). This dilution (the fracturing of the ownership structure) is what brings the last cycle to its end. The holdings of the entrepreneurs are too small to materialize a coup against the management. The management then prevails and the entrepreneurs are neutralized and move on to establish another start-up. The only thing that they leave behind them is their names and their heirs. We can use Game Theory methods to analyse both these situations. Wherever we have economic players bargaining for the allocation of scarce resources in order to attain their utility functions, to secure the outcomes and consequences (the value, the preference, that the player attaches to his outcomes) which are right for them we can use Game Theory (GT). A short recap of the basic tenets of the theory might be in order. GT deals with interactions between agents, whether conscious and intelligent or Dennettic. A Dennettic Agent (DA) is an agent that acts so as to influence the future allocation of resources, but does not need to be either conscious or deliberative to do so. A Game is the set of acts committed by 1 to n rational DA and one a-rational (not irrational but devoid of rationality) DA (nature, a random mechanism). At least 1 DA in a Game must control the result of the set of acts and the DAs must be (at least potentially) at conflict, whole or partial. This is not to say that all the DAs aspire to the same things. They have different priorities and preferences. They rank the likely outcomes of their acts differently. They engage Strategies to obtain their highest ranked outcome. A Strategy is a vector, which details the acts, with which the DA will react in response to all the (possible) acts by the other DAs. An agent is said to be rational if his Strategy does guarantee the attainment of his most preferred goal. Nature is involved by assigning probabilities to the outcomes. An outcome, therefore, is an allocation of resources resulting from the acts of the agents. An agent is said to control the situation if its acts matter to others to the extent that at least one of them is forced to alter at least one vector (Strategy). The Consequence to the agent is the value of a function that assigns real numbers to each of the outcomes. The consequence represents a list of outcomes, prioritized, ranked. It is also known as an ordinal utility function. If the function includes relative numerical importance measures (not only real numbers) we call it a Cardinal Utility Function. Games, naturally, can consist of one player, two players and more than two players (n-players). They can be zero (or fixed) sum (the sum of benefits is fixed and whatever gains made by one of the players are lost by the others). They can be nonzero-sum (the amount of benefits to all players can increase or decrease). Games can be cooperative (where some of the players or all of them form coalitions) or non-cooperative (competitive). For some of the games, the solutions are called Nash equilibria. They are sets of strategies constructed so that an agent which adopts them (and, as a result, secures a certain outcome) will have no incentive to switch over to other strategies (given the strategies of all other players). Nash equilibria (solutions) are the most stable (it is where the system settles down, to borrow from Chaos Theory) but they are not guaranteed to be the most desirable. Consider the famous Prisoners Dilemma in which both players play rationally and reach the Nash equilib rium only to discover that they could have done much better by collaborating (that is, by playing irrationally). Instead, they adopt the Paretto-dominated, or the Paretto-optimal, sub-optimal solution. Any outside interference with the game (for instance, legislation) will be construed as creating a NEW game, not as pushing the players to adopt a Paretto-superior solution. The Negro Artist And The Racial Mountain EssayThere are more serious problems, philosophical in nature. It is generally agreed that changing the game can and very often does move the players from a non-cooperative mode (leading to Paretto-dominated results, which are never desirable) to a cooperative one. A government can force its citizens to cooperate and to obey the law. It can enforce this cooperation. This is often called a Hobbesian dilemma. It arises even in a population made up entirely of altruists. Different utility functions and the process of bargaining are likely to drive these good souls to threaten to become egoists unless other altruists adopt their utility function (their preferences, their bundles). Nash proved that there is an allocation of possible utility functions to these agents so that the equilibrium strategy for each one of them will be this kind of threat. This is a clear social Hobbesian dilemma : the equilibrium is absolute egoism despite the fact that all the players are altruists. This implies that we can learn very little about the outcomes of competitiv e situations from acquainting ourselves with the psychological facts pertaining to the players. The agents, in this example, are not selfish or irrational and, still, they deteriorate in their behaviour, to utter egotism. A complete set of utility functions including details regarding how much they know about one anothers utility functions defines the available equilibrium strategies. The altruists in our example are prisoners of the logic of the game. Only an outside power can release them from their predicament and permit them to materialize their true nature. Gauthier said that morally-constrained agents are more likely to evade Paretto-dominated outcomes in competitive games than agents who are constrained only rationally. But this is unconvincing without the existence of an Hobesian enforcement mechanism (a state is the most common one). Players would do better to avoid Paretto dominated outcomes by imposing the constraints of such a mechanism upon their available strategies. P aretto optimality is defined as efficiency, when there is no state of things (a different distribution of resources) in which at least one player is better off with all the other no worse off. Better off read : with his preference satisfied. This definitely could lead to cooperation (to avoid a bad outcome) but it cannot be shown to lead to the formation of morality, however basic. Criminals can achieve their goals in splendid cooperation and be content, but that does not make it more moral. Game theory is agent neutral, it is utilitarianism at its apex. It does not prescribe to the agent what is good only what is right. It is the ultimate proof that effort at reconciling utilitarianism with more deontological, agent relative, approaches are dubious, in the best of cases. Teleology, in other words, in no guarantee of morality. Acts are either means to an end or ends in themselves. This is no infinite regression. There is bound to be an holy grail (happiness ?) in the role of the ultimate end. A more commonsense view would be to regard acts as means and states of affairs as ends. This, in turn, leads to a teleological outlook : acts are right or wrong in accordance with their effectiveness at securing the achievement of the right goals. Deontology (and its stronger version, absolutism) constrain the means. It states that there is a permitted subset of means, all the other being immoral and, in effect, forbidden. Game Theory is out to shatter both the notion of a finite chain of means and ends culminating in an ultimate end and of the deontological view. It is consequentialist but devoid of any value judgement. Game Theory pretends that human actions are breakable into much smaller molecules called games. Human acts within these games are means to achieving ends but the ends are improbable in their finality. The means are segments of strategies : prescient and omniscient renditions of the possible moves of all the players. Aside from the fact that it involves mnemic causation (direct and deterministic influence by past events) and a similar influence by the utility function (which really pertains to the future) it is highly implausible. Additionally, Game Theory is mired in an internal contradiction : on the one hand it solemnly teaches us that the psychology of the players is absolutely of no consequence. On the other, it hastens to explicitly and axiomatically postulate their rationality and implicitly (and no less axiomatically) their benefit-seeking behaviour (though this aspect is much more muted). This leads to absolutely outlandish results : irrational behaviour leads to total cooper ation, bounded rationality leads to more realistic patterns of cooperation and competition (coopetition) and an unmitigated rational behaviour leads to disaster (also known as Paretto dominated outcomes). Moreover, Game Theory refuses to acknowledge that real games are dynamic, not static. The very concepts of strategy, utility function and extensive (tree like) representation are static. The dynamic is retrospective, not prospective. To be dynamic, the game must include all the information about all the actors, all their strategies, all their utility functions. Each game is a subset of a higher level game, a private case of an implicit game which is constantly played in the background, so to say. This is a hyper-game of which all games are but derivatives. It incorporates all the physically possible moves of all the players. An outside agency with enforcement powers (the state, the police, the courts, the law) are introduced by the players. In this sense, they are not really an outside event which has the effect of altering the game fundamentally. They are part and parcel of the strategies available to the players and cannot be arbitrarily ruled out. On the contrary, their introducti on as part of a dominant strategy will simplify Game theory and make it much more applicable. In other words : players can choose to compete, to cooperate and to cooperate in the formation of an outside agency. There is no logical or mathematical reason to exclude the latter possibility. The ability to thus influence the game is a legitimate part of any real life strategy. Game Theory assumes that the game is a given and the players have to optimize their results within it. It should open itself to the inclusion of game altering or redefining moves by the players as an integral part of their strategies. After all, games entail the existence of some agreement to play and this means that the players accept some rules (this is the role of the prosecutor in the Prisoners Dilemma). If some outside rules (of the game) are permissible why not allow the risk that all the players will agree to form an outside, lawfully binding, arbitration and enforcement agency as part of the game ? Such an agency will be nothing if not the embodiment, the materialization of one of the rules, a move in the players strategies, leading them to more optimal or superior outcomes as far as their utility functions are concerned. Bargaining inevitably leads to an agreement regarding a decision making procedure. An outside agency, which enforces cooperation and some moral code, is such a decision making procedure. It is not an outside agency in the true, physical, sense. It does not alter the game (not to mention its rules). It IS the game, it is a procedure, a way to resolve conflicts, an integral part of any solution and imputation, the herald of cooperation, a representative of some of the will of all the players and, therefore, a part both of their utility functions and of their strategies to obtain their preferred outcomes. Really, these outside agencies ARE the desired outcomes. Once Game Theory digests this observation, it could tackle reality rather than its own idealized contraptions .

Strategies for Canadian Workers and Labour Unions an Example by

Strategies for Canadian Workers and Labour Unions in the 21st Century Every generation faces changes, so as organizations face different challenges throughout its existence. In his book, The Canadian Labour Movement: A Short Story, Heron cited that "three waves of major changes in the organization of work: after 1840, after 1940, and after 1975,". The story of trade and labor unions evolved in the development of organizations and has become an instrumental catalyst in the economic transformation of corporations and institutions. Need essay sample on "Strategies for Canadian Workers and Labour Unions in the 21st Century" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed Labor unions nowadays have been more responsive to different issues like equity and gender. Aside from engaging into collective bargaining agreements with employers, like negotiating work security, conditions and pay, trade unions have also been actively participating in political issues that protect their rights and interests. Towards the 21st century, a quarter of Canadas workforce belonged to trade or labor unions (Encarta, 2008). I am part of the multi-national company and we are compensated well in our jobs. Benefits are at hand and it seems unnecessary to heed on the bargains of trade unions. However, my personal experiences on labor unions were from the project-based employees in our company. These workers were only paid per work basis meaning. The benefits were not available to them unlike the regular staffs. With this at hand, some workers would not step up to bargain since the top management would still dictate on what pay would be given to them, given the conditions mandated by the State or country. This brings to the idea that organizations nowadays are heading to a more competitive status as compared decades ago. Companies have to be conservative in their resources in order to survive competition and to make themselves sustainable. The challenge these organizations face also coincides with the future of labor unions. As mentioned by Errol Black and Jim Silver, the unions will have a difficult time to keep their egalitarian ideals in the face of rapid economic growth and technological change. Pressures are evident in the workplace, thus labor unions have to reinvent strategies to battle off problems like unemployment, downsizing and crises in management. One particular paradigm shift that companies are tackling right now is reducing work hours to create more yet temporary jobs to unemployed people (OHara, 1993). This may result to lower paying and non-permanent jobs, but this is seen as somehow a win-win situation for both the working masses and the company. However, unions are still considered as a factor of economic change for the company and to the rest of the labor force. The insights and skills of the workers still hold as the organizations biggest asset. Labor unions play a promising role to the labor scene. However, there are two propositions that Graham Lowe stated in his book, The Quality of Work: A People Centered Agenda that will keep the labor unions prosper and workers can enjoy a meaningful job amidst the changes in the economy: (1) job quality must be defined along side a wide range of dimensions and (2) the quality of jobs. Lowe, as a sociologist himself, believes that improving job quality will lessen turnovers and promote productivity, thus, giving the company in the better light. Critics may have attacked this idea, but it made sense in the view of management that truly productivity of workers has a direct positive payoff to organizations. Successes of companies and labor workers depend on how both sides cope up with the changing environment. As Peter Drucker puts it, it is the time to do what is for the future precisely since everything is in flux. Unions must have innovative strategies and must also continue to empower its worker-members to have a voice in decision making to balance the overpowering management ideals. What will even bring them to a brighter future is always having a clear vision for the organization, the union and the comprising labor force. Bibliography 2008. Labor Unions in Canada. Microsoft Encarta. Black, E., & Silver, J. (2008). Building a Better World: An Introduction to Trade Unionism in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing Co., Ltd.. Drucker, P. F. (1994). Post-capitalist Society. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann. Heron, C. (1996). The Canadian Labour Movement: A Short History. Toronto: Lorimer. Lowe, G. S. (2000). The Quality of Work: A People-Centred Agenda. New York: Oxford University Press, USA. O'Hara, B. (1993). Working Harder Isn't Working. Vancouver: New Star Books.